Re: lyxserver bug (maybe) and thoughts

[Asger Alstrup Nielsen]

> We should be very restrictive on what we call a bug at this point, the
> '\n' that Jean-Marc added is obvious, changing _any_ part of the
> protocol is not.

Well, I consider the change a bug-fix. The protocol is after all broken, and
should be fixed.

Also, it is a safe change.  The two main existing LyX-server applications are
unaffected, and we have the perspective of getting many more LyX server
applications with a Perl module.

So, all in all, I think it's sensible to apply this when Stefano has it done. 
Obviously, the best would be that we don't need this change, but since we do
have a problem, we should address it.

Actually, I considered whether we should do a CORBA interface in 1.1.x, rather
than a sockets interface.  Anyone got any experience with CORBA?

Greets,

Asger