On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 03:00:12PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > Hi! > > It seems that the best for us would be to bundle a scripting > language. > > In order to avoid having to implement our own language from > scratch, it might make sense to start with something and > hack that to suit our needs. > > I've done a bit of searching and so far found one candidate language > that seem small enough to be bundable: > > Yabasic. A basic variant that's GPL. > > http://www.online.de/home/ihm/basic.htm Great! As my final project in my C programming class, I wrote a basic basic interpreter. So all you need to do is convert it to C++, add functions, and you're set! -Amir
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
- Re: Candiate scripting language bas... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Candiate scripting language... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Cedric Puddy
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Mate Wierdl
- Re: Candiate scripting language bas... Cedric Puddy
- Re: Candiate scripting language... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Candiate scripting lang... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Candiate scripting... Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
- Re: Candiate scrip... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Amir Karger
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Jacek M. Holeczek