I am using Lustre 2.12.0 and seems workign pretty well, anyway I built it against zfs 0.7.12 libraries... was it a mistake ?
what's the zfs release that Lustre 2.12.0 is built/tested on ?


On 2/22/19 12:18 PM, Peter Jones wrote:

Nathan

Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can see the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12 . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺

Peter

*From: *Nathan R Crawford <[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM
*To: *Peter Jones <[email protected]>
*Cc: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?

Hi Peter,

  Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch (https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.

  "Be patient" is an acceptable response :)

-Nate

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over
    2.10.x (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate
    requirement then using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more
    comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an interim development build for
    2.13 and should absolutely not be used for production purposes.

    On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd
    Melchers" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:

        Hi all,
        in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51.
    Which version should
        i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System?

        Mit freundlichen Grüßen
        Bernd Melchers

        --
        Archiv- und Backup-Service | [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
        Freie Universität Berlin   | Tel. +49-30-838-55905
        _______________________________________________
        lustre-discuss mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


    _______________________________________________
    lustre-discuss mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


--

Dr. Nathan [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
Modeling Facility Director
Department of Chemistry
1102 Natural Sciences II         Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
University of California, Irvine  Phone: 949-824-4508
Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to