Please file bugs if anything does! - Patrick ________________________________ From: lustre-discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of Nathan R Crawford <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 7:04:24 PM To: Peter Jones Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?
Thanks for the link! I'll spin up a test system with 2.12.0 and see what breaks. -Nate On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:20 PM Peter Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Nathan Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can see the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12 . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺ Peter From: Nathan R Crawford <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM To: Peter Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use? Hi Peter, Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch (https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started appearing on b2_10 after a week or so. "Be patient" is an acceptable response :) -Nate On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: 2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an interim development build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for production purposes. On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which version should i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System? Mit freundlichen Grüßen Bernd Melchers -- Archiv- und Backup-Service | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Freie Universität Berlin | Tel. +49-30-838-55905 _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org -- Dr. Nathan Crawford [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Modeling Facility Director Department of Chemistry 1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508 Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA -- Dr. Nathan Crawford [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Modeling Facility Director Department of Chemistry 1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508 Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
