Hi Peter, Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch ( https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.
"Be patient" is an acceptable response :) -Nate On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > 2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x > (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then > using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an > interim development build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for > production purposes. > > On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" < > [email protected] on behalf of > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which > version should > i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System? > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Bernd Melchers > > -- > Archiv- und Backup-Service | [email protected] > Freie Universität Berlin | Tel. +49-30-838-55905 > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- Dr. Nathan Crawford [email protected] Modeling Facility Director Department of Chemistry 1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508 Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
