Thanks for addressing my comments. On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, 5:37 AM <chen....@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> Hi Orie， > > Thanks a lot for your review. > > Please find updated version attached based on your comments and other > ADs/DIR comments. > > Could you kindly review the changes and confirm whether they address your > concerns? If there are any remaining issues, please let us know. > > > We appreciate your time and feedback. > > > Best Regards， > > Ran > > > > > > > Original > *From: *陈然00080434 > *To: *OrieSteeleviaDatatracker <nore...@ietf.org>; > *Cc: *The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-fl...@ietf.org < > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-fl...@ietf.org>;lsr-cha...@ietf.org < > lsr-cha...@ietf.org>;lsr@ietf.org <lsr@ietf.org>;acee.i...@gmail.com < > acee.i...@gmail.com>; > *Date: *2025年04月02日 11:06 > *Subject: **Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: (with COMMENT)* > > Hi Orie， > > Thank you for your review and support of this work. > > Please see inline... > > > Best Regards， > > Ran > > > > *From: *OrieSteeleviaDatatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > *To: *The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; > *Cc: *draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-fl...@ietf.org < > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-fl...@ietf.org>;lsr-cha...@ietf.org < > lsr-cha...@ietf.org>;lsr@ietf.org <lsr@ietf.org>;acee.i...@gmail.com < > acee.i...@gmail.com>;acee.i...@gmail.com <acee.i...@gmail.com>; > *Date: *2025年04月02日 03:52 > *Subject: **Orie Steele's No Objection on > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: (with COMMENT)* > Orie Steele has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > # Orie Steele, ART AD, comments for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06 > CC @OR13 > > * line numbers: > - > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06.txt&submitcheck=True > > * comment syntax: > - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md > > * "Handling Ballot Positions": > - > https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > > ## Comments > > ### MUST be considered malformed > > ``` > > 127 MUST be a multiple of 4 octets. If the length is not a multiple > of 4 > 128 octets, the LSA MUST be considered malformed. > ``` > > This could be accomplished with "is malformed". > > > I also wonder if there is some exception that MUST (or MUST NOT) be raised > here? > > Sounds like perhaps malformed things are supposed to be ignored. > > *Ran: will be changed to: .. > If the length is not a multiple of 4 octets, the LSA is malformed and MUST > be ignored. Please let us know if this addresses your concern.* > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
