Orie Steele has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Orie Steele, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06 CC @OR13 * line numbers: - https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06.txt&submitcheck=True * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Comments ### MUST be considered malformed ``` 127 MUST be a multiple of 4 octets. If the length is not a multiple of 4 128 octets, the LSA MUST be considered malformed. ``` This could be accomplished with "is malformed". I also wonder if there is some exception that MUST (or MUST NOT) be raised here? Sounds like perhaps malformed things are supposed to be ignored. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
