As I see all this I think this: as I see it is better to have groups per city as having "Real" meetings is much better than IRC/mail and even Hangout as (not everyone in the world have propper internet access) but having this huge amount of new teams will mean that we will need much more resources for the teams (ubuntu packs for example) so I propose to have a clear guides for this or we let every city/region to have a LoCo or is one per country and every country do whatever they think is best inside of it. Both ideas has pros and cons and I think we have a LoCo Council so the LoCo council must decide this, the ones with this responsability should decide, that´s with they have resposability. we don't have to argue or fight just expose yout ideas in a "Human" way.
Isn't been Human what Ubuntu is all about? Pablo 2013/4/3 Martin Owens <docto...@gmail.com> > On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 22:41 -0700, Jono Bacon wrote: > > and I worry at times that our requirements around approval or > > meeting a certain criteria can stand in the way of teams being active. > > It's higher than it needs to be for certain resources. > > > If we reject them because they don't fit our criteria > > Criteria are broad at the moment. This gives teams less structure around > what the should do to support Ubuntu. But various ideas on what to do > have become the de-jur standard and semi-integrated into the tests. > > > we should let them post their blog posts to loco.ubuntu.com > > Make - "Default to permissive and restrict only when needed in specific > cases." > > > before anything brews any further. > > broils, you're the meat guy. I think there might be a few brewers on the > list ;-) > > Martin, > > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >
-- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
