Hello, Christopher. > What specifically is dangerous about this? Well, because you're accessing internals of tree_node structure directly. Please use macroses.
> I'm no GCC expert, but the DECL_ARGUMENTS() seems to be the only place > where the restrict qualifier is preserved under C++. While debugging I > could inspect the data structure to see that the information I needed > was there, but looking in tree.h I found no TREE_... macro that got me > there. This sometimes mean, that such data shouldn't be used at all ;) What's wrong with TREE_TYPE(decl) ? > The ?: came about because while bootstrapping GCC there were cases > when DelArgs was NULL. It seems a bit of a hack, I know, but it's the > best I could figure and it seems to work properly in my tests. If you > have a suggestion on a more proper way to consistently get the > restrict qualifier I'm all ears. =) What was the function decl in that case? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
