Hello, Christopher. > + tree RestrictArgTy = (DeclArgs) ? DeclArgs->type.common.type : ArgTy; This looks very dangerous. Why can't standard TREE_ macro be used here? Also, please add a comment describing what's going here (why you need such thing) :)
-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits