Hello, Christopher.

> +    tree RestrictArgTy = (DeclArgs) ? DeclArgs->type.common.type : ArgTy;
This looks very dangerous. Why can't standard TREE_ macro be used here?
Also, please add a comment describing what's going here (why you need
such thing) :)

-- 
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.

Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.


_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

Reply via email to