On Jul 31, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>
>> Hello, Christopher.
>>
>>> - return TypeDB.setType(type, ConvertFunctionType(type, NULL,
>>> CallingConv));
>>> + return TypeDB.setType(type, ConvertFunctionType(type,
>>> orig_type, NULL, CallingConv));
>> and another one: second argument should be "declaration" tree, not
>> "type" tree. This was caused build error on darwin (reported by
>> Tanya):
>
> Right. It seems that getting the declaration tree at that point is
> rather difficult. Any suggestions?
Turns out that this type conversion is being requested on a struct
which contains a function pointer, and the conversion is happening on
that function pointer.
Am I correct in assuming that if we've followed this code path to
ConvertFunctionType then we have no declaration to pass through?
from darwin-crt3.c:
typedef int (*cxa_atexit_p)(void (*func) (void*), void* arg, const
void* dso);
struct atexit_data
{
int result;
cxa_atexit_p cxa_atexit;
};
static void cxa_atexit_check_2 (void *arg)
{
((struct atexit_data *)arg)->result = 1;
}
--
Christopher Lamb
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
