vogelsgesang wrote: > What I could imagine is to drive this via attributes instead of a heuristic. > We could potentially mark implementation details of libc++ as such to control > what the debugging experience is like at a much finer grain if we used > attributes, but obviously this would also increase complexity in the code and > it would be yet another thing that we have to slap on almost every > declaration.
Mayve we could also find some other convention. E.g. hiding the `std::*::__detail` namespace. (You could still move all those `__` methods into a different namespace, right? They are not part of the stable ABI, are they?). Using a namespace would have the benefit that 1. you don't need to annotate each individual method, you can simply use a scope 2. we don't need to add a new attribute to clang, dwarf etc. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108870 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
