vogelsgesang wrote: > We really should add a "disable" to the frame recognizers
Do you mean something like #109219? (Test cases still missing; rest should be ready for review) > Seems to me like this feature should be tuned to "users of libc++" not > "developers of libc++". Agree, I think that should be the goal here > I wonder if a heuristic for the callback case could be: mark all but the > first libc++ entry point as an implementation detail. Would this be even more > aggressive? Also, the implementation of this might be a bit awkward. Not > sure. Wdyt? 🤔 Might be a good idea... I will have to experiment a bit with this... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108870 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
