jimingham wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2024, at 3:16 PM, rocallahan ***@***.***> wrote: > > > Is there a notion of "reverse stepping" like "take me to the line that > preceded this one in execution history", and if so what contains the logic > that does that? > > rr supports the "bs" gdbserver packet to reverse-step a single instruction > (and so does the test proxy I'm adding here). To "reverse-next one line" we > will need to implement a thread plan that uses a combination of > reverse-step-instruction and reverse-continue-to-breakpoint. That's future > work. It may be difficult, and it's also not very high priority because it > tends not to get used very much by gdb users. > I guessed that was the case. We should still try to do something here, tbreak/reverse continue probably gets old over time, but that seems fine to leave for "future work". Jim > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736#issuecomment-2257103012>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVWZ4UEIOTRV5ERJCPM3ZO25MHAVCNFSM6AAAAABLFTBQAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENJXGEYDGMBRGI>. > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
