jimingham wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2024, at 1:06 PM, rocallahan ***@***.***> wrote: > > > As it stands, this will allow "reverse continue to a breakpoint", right? > > Using rr as the backend you can reverse-continue to any stop, including > signals, watchpoints and the "history boundary" i.e. start of time. I expect > the other stop types don't work well yet. I plan to work on them next. We can > delay adding the CLI for reverse-continue until they work adequately. > > But once "in the past" you wouldn't be able to do either forward or reverse > steps, you are just going to navigate by breakpoint? > > After reverse-continue you can do any kind of forward execution you want. > With LLDB + rr, you're always "in the past" since during debugging rr > always/only navigates history; when you're at a certain point in time the > state of LLDB and rr is independent of whether you got there by forward or > reverse execution. And LLDB + rr is pretty much fully functional already --- > except for the absence of reverse-execution commands. > Is there a notion of "reverse stepping" like "take me to the line that preceded this one in execution history", and if so what contains the logic that does that? Jim > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736#issuecomment-2256799688>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVW2BNU5A4UKC5T2AB6DZO2OETAVCNFSM6AAAAABLFTBQAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENJWG44TSNRYHA>. > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
