================
@@ -2225,7 +2225,8 @@ void ObjectFileMachO::ParseSymtab(Symtab &symtab) {
const char *file_name = file.GetFilename().AsCString("<Unknown>");
LLDB_SCOPED_TIMERF("ObjectFileMachO::ParseSymtab () module = %s", file_name);
LLDB_LOG(log, "Parsing symbol table for {0}", file_name);
- Progress progress(llvm::formatv("Parsing symbol table for {0}", file_name));
+ Progress progress(llvm::formatv("Parsing symbol table for {0}", file_name),
+ Progress::ProgressReportType::eAggregateProgressReport);
----------------
chelcassanova wrote:
The intention is that if `is_aggregate == false` then the progress report type
can be grouped together in LLDB under one large umbrella progress report for
that operation whereas if `is_aggregate == true` then the IDE could potentially
filter out those progress reports since each progress report happening
individually means that they look spammy in an IDE.
Instead of using a string as a `category` field we could have each progress
report type/category be an enum in `lldb_enumerations.h` i.e.
`ProgressReportType/Category == eProgressSymbolTableParse` or
`eProgressDWARFIndexing`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69516
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
