jasonmolenda added a comment.

And to be clear, the problem is that we start out with an expression like 
`first[0]` which we find the Section + address for `first`, then resolve to a 
load address (addr_t) via the Target SectionLoadList, and then try to read 
memory from that address - at which point we go the other direction, converting 
the addr_t into a Section+offset via the Target SectionLoadList.  When we have 
the old section entries in SectionLoadList, we don't end up with the same 
Section+offset as we started on -- one of the old entries is picked up (if you 
slide it the right way - like the test does) and you read data from the wrong 
address in the file.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D130534/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D130534

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to