labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D98197#2613227 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98197#2613227>, @jankratochvil wrote: >> I guess we should also delete >> `test/Shell/Breakpoint/implicit_const_form_support.test`, as it's not very >> useful (the numbers it checks come from the line table, not from the >> implicit constants). > > I have not deleted it myself; I find non-racy simple tests to be always good > as they may catch some completely unrelated regression in the future. Fine, I'll do it afterwards. :) If it was at least testing what it claims it's testing, I might keep it. However, judging by the need to re-fix implicit const support, it's not doing a good job at even that. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98197/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98197 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits