labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In D98197#2613227 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98197#2613227>, @jankratochvil 
wrote:

>> I guess we should also delete 
>> `test/Shell/Breakpoint/implicit_const_form_support.test`, as it's not very 
>> useful (the numbers it checks come from the line table, not from the 
>> implicit constants).
>
> I have not deleted it myself; I find non-racy simple tests to be always good 
> as they may catch some completely unrelated regression in the future.

Fine, I'll do it afterwards. :) If it was at least testing what it claims it's 
testing, I might keep it. However, judging by the need to re-fix implicit const 
support, it's not doing a good job at even that.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D98197/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D98197

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to