It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports. On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote:
> Any news regarding false-negatives? > > +Mitch Phillips <mit...@google.com> > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks, Vitaly. >> Somebody is looking at this. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> There is some issue, at least on staging. >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >>>> stages but marked as SUCCESS >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Done. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the >>>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Galina >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>>>> frequently offline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's >>>>>>>>>> OK for now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>>>> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >>>>>>>>>>> staging. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via >>>>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. >>>>>>>>>>>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting >>>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the >>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility to >>>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without >>>>>>>>>>>> restarting the >>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a >>>>>>>>>>>> script that >>>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >>>>>>>>>>>> requirements >>>>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
