Any news regarding false-negatives? +Mitch Phillips <mit...@google.com>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Vitaly. > Somebody is looking at this. > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > >> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> There is some issue, at least on staging. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >>> stages but marked as SUCCESS >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Done. >>>> >>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the >>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Galina >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>>> frequently offline. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's >>>>>>>>> OK for now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>>> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >>>>>>>>>> staging. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits >>>>>>>>>>> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, >>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. >>>>>>>>>>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting >>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the >>>>>>>>>>> flexibility to >>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a >>>>>>>>>>> script that >>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >>>>>>>>>>> requirements >>>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
