Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! Much appreciated.
Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was > frequently offline. > > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone! >> >> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >> move all the green bots back there. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> They do on staging. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> >>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>> annotated commands: >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for >>>> now. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >>>>> bot. >>>>> >>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Galina >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>> lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >>>>>>> will need more love and care. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >>>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to >>>>>> use >>>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >>>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>> buildbot >>>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >>>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of >>>>>> the >>>>>> script. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>> >>>>>
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
