llunak updated this revision to Diff 288780. llunak edited the summary of this revision. llunak added a comment.
And it indeed was suspicious. 3fd917d8860e9bdcabc14c536da4377307906be0 didn't update the UnwindPlan copy ctor to copy the field. This patch fixes the problem even without your change. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86417/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86417 Files: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h Index: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h =================================================================== --- lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h +++ lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler(rhs.m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler), m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations( rhs.m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations), + m_plan_is_for_signal_trap(rhs.m_plan_is_for_signal_trap), m_lsda_address(rhs.m_lsda_address), m_personality_func_addr(rhs.m_personality_func_addr) { m_row_list.reserve(rhs.m_row_list.size());
Index: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h =================================================================== --- lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h +++ lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler(rhs.m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler), m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations( rhs.m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations), + m_plan_is_for_signal_trap(rhs.m_plan_is_for_signal_trap), m_lsda_address(rhs.m_lsda_address), m_personality_func_addr(rhs.m_personality_func_addr) { m_row_list.reserve(rhs.m_row_list.size());
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits