llunak updated this revision to Diff 288780.
llunak edited the summary of this revision.
llunak added a comment.
And it indeed was suspicious. 3fd917d8860e9bdcabc14c536da4377307906be0 didn't
update the UnwindPlan copy ctor to copy the field.
This patch fixes the problem even without your change.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86417/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86417
Files:
lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
Index: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
===================================================================
--- lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
+++ lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@
m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler(rhs.m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler),
m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations(
rhs.m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations),
+ m_plan_is_for_signal_trap(rhs.m_plan_is_for_signal_trap),
m_lsda_address(rhs.m_lsda_address),
m_personality_func_addr(rhs.m_personality_func_addr) {
m_row_list.reserve(rhs.m_row_list.size());
Index: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
===================================================================
--- lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
+++ lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@
m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler(rhs.m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler),
m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations(
rhs.m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations),
+ m_plan_is_for_signal_trap(rhs.m_plan_is_for_signal_trap),
m_lsda_address(rhs.m_lsda_address),
m_personality_func_addr(rhs.m_personality_func_addr) {
m_row_list.reserve(rhs.m_row_list.size());
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
