llunak updated this revision to Diff 288780.
llunak edited the summary of this revision.
llunak added a comment.

And it indeed was suspicious. 3fd917d8860e9bdcabc14c536da4377307906be0 didn't 
update the UnwindPlan copy ctor to copy the field.

This patch fixes the problem even without your change.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86417/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86417

Files:
  lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h


Index: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
===================================================================
--- lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
+++ lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@
         m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler(rhs.m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler),
         m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations(
             rhs.m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations),
+        m_plan_is_for_signal_trap(rhs.m_plan_is_for_signal_trap),
         m_lsda_address(rhs.m_lsda_address),
         m_personality_func_addr(rhs.m_personality_func_addr) {
     m_row_list.reserve(rhs.m_row_list.size());


Index: lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
===================================================================
--- lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
+++ lldb/include/lldb/Symbol/UnwindPlan.h
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@
         m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler(rhs.m_plan_is_sourced_from_compiler),
         m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations(
             rhs.m_plan_is_valid_at_all_instruction_locations),
+        m_plan_is_for_signal_trap(rhs.m_plan_is_for_signal_trap),
         m_lsda_address(rhs.m_lsda_address),
         m_personality_func_addr(rhs.m_personality_func_addr) {
     m_row_list.reserve(rhs.m_row_list.size());
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to