aprantl added inline comments.

================
Comment at: source/Core/ValueObject.cpp:1706-1708
+  for (auto *runtime : process->GetLanguageRuntimes()) {
+    if (runtime->IsWhitelistedRuntimeValue(GetName()))
+      return false;
----------------
clayborg wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > jingham wrote:
> > > clayborg wrote:
> > > > davide wrote:
> > > > > clayborg wrote:
> > > > > > Still seems weird that any language can white list a variable by 
> > > > > > name. Say swift has a variable named "this" which is truly should 
> > > > > > be hidden and is marked as artificial, we will always show it...
> > > > > Swift has no `this`, it has `self`. And yes, there are many places in 
> > > > > the debugger where `self` is mentioned explicitly by name and has 
> > > > > special handling. Also, I think we want to show it, most of the times.
> > > > Exactly Davide. **Any** language can whitelist **any** variable they 
> > > > want for **any** other language regardless of the language of origin of 
> > > > the current ValueObject.
> > > I agree with Greg.  Otherwise various languages are going to fight about 
> > > their respective white lists.  We should really get the ValueObject's 
> > > runtime language with  ValueObject::GetObjectRuntimeLanguage() and then 
> > > asking that runtime.
> > That's true, but in practice not likely a big problem, since you'd, e.g., 
> > need to have an *artificial* variable called `self` in C++ for this to 
> > surface.
> What variables are we actually trying to not show here? Seems like we mostly 
> want to see the variables, even artificial ones. Does anyone know what the 
> variables that we don't want to see are? And how big of a problem are they?
The ones Jim mentioned earlier: Clang injects helper variables for VLA size, 
Swift injects various kinds of type metadata. We definitely do want to hide 
them.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63240/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63240



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to