xiaobai added a comment. In D63240#1559913 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63240#1559913>, @jingham wrote:
> Shouldn't ValueObjectVariables figure out their runtime language from their > defining frame, not their CompilerType? For a ValueObject you get from an > expression, you probably can't do that. But we're always talking about > hiding locals or args here - i.e. they are all ValueObjectVariables. And it > seems to me that in that case getting the RuntimeLanguage from the containing > frame is much more useful than from the CompilerType. Does every variable have an associated frame? I imagine things like global variables wouldn't. I'm not sure if any language or implementation of a language has global variables as compiler/runtime helper variables, but I'm not comfortable making that assumption since one of my goals is more generalized language support. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63240/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63240 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
