hintonda added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39436#911274, @jingham wrote:
> BTW, to Z's comment: you can't really resolve the regex pattern when you make > the breakpoint. What if another library gets loaded later on, which has > source files that match the source file pattern the user entered, and have > source code that matches the -p pattern. The breakpoint should be updated to > encompass those new locations, but you can't do that if you've already > matched the pattern against the original list of files, and then thrown away > the pattern. Isn't this how it already works with all breakpoints? If you load more modules, do more locations get automatically loaded? Sorry if that's a dumb question. > This needs to be maintained as a pattern in the breakpoint, if you want it to > be an actual pattern. But we shouldn't overload FileSpec for that purpose, > IMO. It already is a pattern if used without a path. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39436 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
