On 24 October 2017 at 08:58, Ted Woodward via Phabricator <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > ted added a comment. > > We build lldb, clang and tools for Hexagon only, and call them hexagon-lldb, > hexagon-clang, etc. The test infrastructure is smart enough to pick up > hexagon-lldb-mi if we tell it to run with hexagon-lldb using --executable; > will it be smart enough to run an in-tree hexagon-clang? > > @labath, we run on Windows using hexagon-clang and hexagon-clang++; don't > forget the embedded cases when choosing compilers and running tests.
For the embedded case, I assume have to run dotest manually anyway (?) If that's true, then nothing will change for you, as we're not touching that part at all. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
