================ @@ -82,20 +82,25 @@ # CHECK-NEXT: (lldb) disassemble --name case2 # CHECK-NEXT: command-disassemble.s.tmp`n1::case2: # CHECK-NEXT: command-disassemble.s.tmp[0x2044] <+0>: int $0x32 -# CHECK-NEXT: warning: Not disassembling a range because it is very large [0x0000000000002046-0x0000000000004046). To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option. +# CHECK-NEXT: warning: Not disassembling a function because it is very large [0x0000000000002046-0x0000000000004046). To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option. # CHECK-NEXT: (lldb) disassemble --name case3 -# CHECK-NEXT: error: Not disassembling a range because it is very large [0x0000000000004046-0x0000000000006046). To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option. -# CHECK-NEXT: Not disassembling a range because it is very large [0x0000000000006046-0x0000000000008046). To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option. +# CHECK-NEXT: error: Not disassembling a function because it is very large [0x0000000000006046-0x0000000000007046)[0x0000000000009046-0x000000000000a046). To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option. ---------------- DavidSpickett wrote:
All the options are a bit strange but yes that achieves the objective of not spamming the terminal in a way where it would be hard to tell where the output begins and ends. Which is especially important if the function spans multiple ranges. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126505 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
