================
@@ -82,20 +82,25 @@
 # CHECK-NEXT: (lldb) disassemble --name case2
 # CHECK-NEXT: command-disassemble.s.tmp`n1::case2:
 # CHECK-NEXT: command-disassemble.s.tmp[0x2044] <+0>: int    $0x32
-# CHECK-NEXT: warning: Not disassembling a range because it is very large 
[0x0000000000002046-0x0000000000004046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
+# CHECK-NEXT: warning: Not disassembling a function because it is very large 
[0x0000000000002046-0x0000000000004046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
 # CHECK-NEXT: (lldb) disassemble --name case3
-# CHECK-NEXT: error: Not disassembling a range because it is very large 
[0x0000000000004046-0x0000000000006046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
-# CHECK-NEXT: Not disassembling a range because it is very large 
[0x0000000000006046-0x0000000000008046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
+# CHECK-NEXT: error: Not disassembling a function because it is very large 
[0x0000000000006046-0x0000000000007046)[0x0000000000009046-0x000000000000a046). 
To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use 
the --force option.
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:

If you specify a limit does it start from the lowest address of the function or 
the entry point. I'd guess lowest address, because there's no way to say "100 
forward and 100 backwards".

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126505
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to