================
@@ -82,20 +82,25 @@
 # CHECK-NEXT: (lldb) disassemble --name case2
 # CHECK-NEXT: command-disassemble.s.tmp`n1::case2:
 # CHECK-NEXT: command-disassemble.s.tmp[0x2044] <+0>: int    $0x32
-# CHECK-NEXT: warning: Not disassembling a range because it is very large 
[0x0000000000002046-0x0000000000004046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
+# CHECK-NEXT: warning: Not disassembling a function because it is very large 
[0x0000000000002046-0x0000000000004046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
 # CHECK-NEXT: (lldb) disassemble --name case3
-# CHECK-NEXT: error: Not disassembling a range because it is very large 
[0x0000000000004046-0x0000000000006046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
-# CHECK-NEXT: Not disassembling a range because it is very large 
[0x0000000000006046-0x0000000000008046). To disassemble specify an instruction 
count limit, start/stop addresses or use the --force option.
+# CHECK-NEXT: error: Not disassembling a function because it is very large 
[0x0000000000006046-0x0000000000007046)[0x0000000000009046-0x000000000000a046). 
To disassemble specify an instruction count limit, start/stop addresses or use 
the --force option.
----------------
labath wrote:

Currently it will print  `limit` instructions from every range (this is shown 
in the next test case, line 89). This is mainly a side-effect of the fact that 
we don't make much of a difference between two ranges belonging to the same 
function and two ranges from two different functions, but maybe it also kind of 
slightly makes sense? At least it avoids us needing to worry about which range 
will contain the entry point (the ranges are sorted so it might not be the 
first one)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126505
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to