I've got an experience in translating postgresql english documentation into french. And what we got, despite all considerations, is that a solo translator make a better quality work than many ! So I let him go alone on it (his nickname is "gleu") (sarcastic lol).
That's because there is a lot of vocabulary involving technical words that need experience on the tool, in the specific language. And a large documentation need to be homogeneous. May be transifex will help on this purpose, to share vocabulary. Regards, Julien. 2017-06-22 21:38 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>: > Hello Julien, > > For opinions on translation, I defer mostly to people with more experience > that me. (I'm afraid I only speak English). > > Cheers, Cameron. > > On 21/6/17 8:00 am, Vicky Vergara wrote: > > Hello Julien. > > +1 to wait for transifex translations for new documents or completely > rewritten documents. > > and focus the efforts of the translators on the files with "not so many > changes". > So that, when moving to transifex the already translated strings, we know > are "almost" valid strings. > > > Vicky > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Julien Moquet <moquet.jul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Cameron, >> >> Yes, and I made a tweet out of it ! >> Thank you for your help too. >> >> About the translations, as transifex will arrive soon (thanks to Vicky >> !), it should be a good idea to wait a bit more, and let them use and >> practice transifex rather than text on github. Vicky tell me how to add the >> french translation by myself before. >> What do you think of ? >> >> Regards, >> Julien. >> >> 2017-06-20 22:45 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi Julien, >>> >>> In case you missed it, I've reviewed your Proj4 Project Overview, pull >>> request is here: >>> >>> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/pull/216 >>> Thanks for your work. >>> >>> >>> On 17/6/17 7:19 am, Julien Moquet wrote: >>> >>> Hi Cameron, >>> >>> >>> >> Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in >>> hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit. >>> >>> Thank you for telling me. I am sure she'd be back soon. >>> >>> >>> >> I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this >>> weekend, from a readability point of view. >>> >>> I'm done with proj4 on my side : doc & iso 10.5 are good for me. >>> I am about to pull request it. >>> >>> It would have been done whatever the release it is for. It wasn't so >>> much work to do. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Julien. >>> >>> 2017-06-16 22:22 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi Julien, >>>> >>>> Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in hospital, >>>> so she will be short on spare time for a bit. >>>> >>>> I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this weekend, >>>> from a readability point of view. >>>> >>>> Warm regards, Cameron >>>> >>>> On 16/6/17 7:15 am, Julien Moquet wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Vicky, >>>> >>>> I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test. >>>> >>>> I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few change : >>>> are you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Julien. >>>> >>>> 2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <moquet.jul...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Vicky, >>>>> >>>>> I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs is : >>>>> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'll have a look on pgRouting. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Julien. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vi...@georepublic.de>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Julien, >>>>>> >>>>>> Now about the documentation >>>>>> I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences: >>>>>> is that correct? >>>>>> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...juli >>>>>> en2512:master >>>>>> >>>>>> I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in the list of >>>>>> incubating projects), so this might not apply. >>>>>> >>>>>> .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png >>>>>> :scale: 100 % >>>>>> :alt: OSGeo Project >>>>>> :align: right >>>>>> :target: http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍 >>>>>> You might as well do the PR so that the other members of the team >>>>>> can give you feed back. >>>>>> Vicky. >>>>>> >>>>>> PS, in pgRouting the documentation is done in such a way, to make >>>>>> minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo Live. >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet < >>>>>> moquet.jul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Vicky, >>>>>>> My fork is up to date regarding the overview and quickstart: >>>>>>> https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc >>>>>>> Before making a pull request, I need to test it over the >>>>>>> OsGeoLive-10.5 (on wednesday or thursday). >>>>>>> Although, as I read the sources.list include in this version, I >>>>>>> don't really think the latest proj4 will be used. >>>>>>> The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the stable 4.8.0-3 >>>>>>> proj4 release to be used. See : http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubunt >>>>>>> ugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/ >>>>>>> and https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sourc >>>>>>> es.list.d/ubuntugis.list >>>>>>> That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4 release on its >>>>>>> overview. >>>>>>> I only bypass the metacrs and stuff. >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Julien. >>>>>>> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vi...@georepublic.de>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Julien, et all >>>>>>>> Maybe you can help me. >>>>>>>> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version >>>>>>>> to use, while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to >>>>>>>> proj4. >>>>>>>> (my mail merge skills are not so good) >>>>>>>> So, here is the hand made mail: >>>>>>>> Hi all, With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be >>>>>>>> re-inserting each project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> each project has replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and >>>>>>>> verified the application works as expected. Can you please: 0. Reply >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>> return email to confirm that you have recieved this email and that you >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be better if >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> can) 1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or >>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>> been updated, (and version numbers are correct) 2. Reply to confirm >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the previous 10.5 version is >>>>>>>> ok), and >>>>>>>> updated the quickstart where needed. We understand that version 4.9.2 >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> proj4 will be installed on OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was >>>>>>>> installed on >>>>>>>> OSGeo-Live 10.5.) >>>>>>>> (all in one reply is ok) >>>>>>>> Full package status can be seen here: >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl >>>>>>>> M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150 Key >>>>>>>> Milestones ------------------- 18-Jun-2017 All docs reviewed >>>>>>>> and verified 21-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final >>>>>>>> application versions installed - Beta stage) 24-Jul-2017 >>>>>>>> OSGeo-Live Final ISO 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston ... full >>>>>>>> schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com >>>>>>>> /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter < >>>>>>>> cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Julien, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko >>>>>>>>> and Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to >>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>>> If you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Warm regards, Cameron >>>>>>>>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other >>>>>>>>> languages, including proj4js, ..." > Agreed that metacrs is probably >>>>>>>>> a bit >>>>>>>>> too .. >>>>>>>>> I am fully agree too. >>>>>>>>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the >>>>>>>>> proj4 French Translation pages. >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault < >>>>>>>>> even.roua...@spatialys.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > Hi Evan, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects >>>>>>>>>> together. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that >>>>>>>>>> grouping >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > which is active? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from >>>>>>>>>> OSGeo-Live >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say >>>>>>>>>> "Proj4 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, >>>>>>>>>> ..." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > Your thoughts are welcome. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - proj4js: no opinion >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - cs-map: no-opinion >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in >>>>>>>>>> particular, mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a >>>>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>>>> dependency that doesn't require to be visible from users. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - proj4j: no opinion >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ >>>>>>>>>> would be a possible replacement >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks >>>>>>>>>> exploring OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 >>>>>>>>>> as a >>>>>>>>>> standalone project. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.spatialys.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Cameron Shorter >>>>>>>>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >>>>>>>> Salzmannstraße 44, >>>>>>>> 81739 München, Germany >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vicky Vergara >>>>>>>> Operations Research >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> eMail: vi...@georepublic.de >>>>>>>> Web: https://georepublic.info >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >>>>>>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >>>>>>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) >>>>>> Salzmannstraße 44, >>>>>> 81739 München, Germany >>>>>> >>>>>> Vicky Vergara >>>>>> Operations Research >>>>>> >>>>>> eMail: vi...@georepublic.de >>>>>> Web: https://georepublic.info >>>>>> >>>>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 >>>>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 >>>>>> >>>>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 >>>>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Live-demo mailing >>>> listLive-demo@lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demohttp://live.osgeo.orghttp://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cameron Shorter >>>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Cameron Shorter >>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list >> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma >> n/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Liv >> e_GIS_Disc > > -- > > Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) > Salzmannstraße 44, > 81739 München, Germany > > Vicky Vergara > Operations Research > > eMail: vi...@georepublic.de > Web: https://georepublic.info > > Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 > Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 > CEO: Daniel Kastl > > > -- > Cameron Shorter > M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254> > >
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
