Hi Julien,

In case you missed it, I've reviewed your Proj4 Project Overview, pull request is here:

https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/pull/216

Thanks for your work.

On 17/6/17 7:19 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
Hi Cameron,


>> Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.

Thank you for telling me. I am sure she'd be back soon.


>> I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this weekend, from a readability point of view.

I'm done with proj4 on my side : doc & iso 10.5 are good for me.
I am about to pull request it.

It would have been done whatever the release it is for. It wasn't so much work to do.

Regards,
Julien.

2017-06-16 22:22 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com <mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>>:

    Hi Julien,

    Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in
    hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.

    I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this
    weekend, from a readability point of view.

    Warm regards, Cameron


    On 16/6/17 7:15 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
    Hi Vicky,

    I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test.

    I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few
    change : are you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ?

    Regards,
    Julien.

    2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <moquet.jul...@gmail.com
    <mailto:moquet.jul...@gmail.com>>:

        Hi Vicky,

        I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs
        is :
        http://www.osgeo.org/incubator


        I'll have a look on pgRouting.

        Regards,
        Julien.


        2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vi...@georepublic.de
        <mailto:vi...@georepublic.de>>:

            Hello Julien,

            Now about the documentation
            I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences:
            is that correct?
            
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master
            
<https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master>

            I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in
            the list of incubating projects), so this might not apply.

            .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png
               :scale: 100 %
               :alt: OSGeo Project
               :align: right
               :target:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html
            <http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html>

            ​
            ​But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍​
            ​You might as well do the PR so that the other members of
            the team can give you feed back.​
            ​Vicky.​
            ​​
            PS, in pgRouting   the documentation is done in such a
            way, to make minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo
            Live.
            On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet
            <moquet.jul...@gmail.com
            <mailto:moquet.jul...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                Hi Vicky,
                My fork is up to date regarding the overview and
                quickstart:
                https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc
                <https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc>
                Before making a pull request, I need to test it over
                the OsGeoLive-10.5 (on wednesday or thursday).
                Although, as I read the sources.list include in this
                version, I don't really think the latest proj4 will
                be used.
                The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the
                stable 4.8.0-3 proj4 release to be used. See :
                
http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/
                
<http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/>

                and
                
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list
                
<https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list>

                That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4
                release on its overview.
                I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.
                Regards,
                Julien.
                2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara
                <vi...@georepublic.de <mailto:vi...@georepublic.de>>:

                    Hi Julien, et all
                    Maybe you can help me.
                    It so happened that I sent another mail asking
                    about what version to use, while reviewing today,
                    I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
                    (my mail merge skills are not so good)
                    So, here is the hand made mail:
                    Hi all, With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot,
                    we will be re-inserting each project into the
                    OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each
                    project has replied to confirm that they have
                    reviewed docs and verified the application works
                    as expected. Can you please:  0. Reply by return
                    email to confirm that you have recieved this
                    email and that you are able to check docs within
                    the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be better if you
                    can)  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is
                    still accurate, or has been updated, (and version
                    numbers are correct)  2. Reply to confirm you
                    have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
                    previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the
                    quickstart where needed.  We understand that
                    version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on
                    OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on
                    OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
                    (all in one reply is ok)
                    Full package status can be seen here:
                    
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
                    
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150>
Key Milestones ------------------- 18-Jun-2017 All docs reviewed and verified 21-Jun-2017 OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions installed - Beta stage) 24-Jul-2017 OSGeo-Live Final ISO 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017
                    Boston ... full schedule
                    
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
                    
<http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB>

                    On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter
                    <cameron.shor...@gmail.com
                    <mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                        Hi Julien,

                        Thanks for offering to help with
                        translations. I'm looping in Niko and Vicky
                        who are currently wrestling with trying to
                        get transifex to work. If you are familiar
                        with it, you might be able to help them.

                        Warm regards, Cameron

                        On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
                        Hi,
                        >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been
                        translated into other languages, including
                        proj4js, ..." > Agreed that metacrs is
                        probably a bit too ..
                        I am fully agree too.
                        And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages,
                        I can help on the proj4 French Translation
                        pages.
                        Regards,
                        2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault
                        <even.roua...@spatialys.com
                        <mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>>:

                            On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST
                            Cameron Shorter wrote:

                            > Hi Evan,

                            >

                            > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering
                            all the Proj4 projects together.

                            > However, it appears that proj4 is the
                            only project in that grouping

                            > which is active?

                            >

                            > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS"
                            should be dropped from OSGeo-Live

                            > as a concept and "Proj4" be used
                            instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4

                            > has been translated into other
                            languages, including proj4js, ..."

                            >

                            > Your thoughts are welcome.

                            Regarding what is listed currently in
                            metacrs :

                            - proj4js: no opinion

                            - cs-map: no-opinion

                            - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used
                            underneath by GDAL in particular, mostly
                            in maintaince mode, but can be treated
                            as a technical dependency that doesn't
                            require to be visible from users.

                            - proj4j: no opinion

                            - spatialreference.org
                            <http://spatialreference.org>: not
                            maintained in years. http://epsg.io/
                            would be a possible replacement

                            Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit
                            too ... meta for folks exploring
                            OSGeo-Live content, so it could make
                            sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
                            project.

--
                            Spatialys - Geospatial professional services

                            http://www.spatialys.com

-- Cameron Shorter
                        M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>

--
                    Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
                    Salzmannstraße 44,
                    81739 München, Germany

                    Vicky Vergara
                    Operations Research

                    eMail: vi...@georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
                    Web:https://georepublic.info

                    Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
                    Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

                    Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
                    CEO: Daniel Kastl

--
            Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
            Salzmannstraße 44,
            81739 München, Germany

            Vicky Vergara
            Operations Research

            eMail: vi...@georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
            Web:https://georepublic.info

            Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
            Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

            Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
            CEO: Daniel Kastl

    _______________________________________________
    Live-demo mailing list
    Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org>
    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
    <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo>
    http://live.osgeo.org
    http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
    <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc>

-- Cameron Shorter
    M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>

--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Reply via email to