Hi Julien,

Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.

I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this weekend, from a readability point of view.

Warm regards, Cameron


On 16/6/17 7:15 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
Hi Vicky,

I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test.

I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few change : are you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ?

Regards,
Julien.

2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <moquet.jul...@gmail.com <mailto:moquet.jul...@gmail.com>>:

    Hi Vicky,

    I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs is :
    http://www.osgeo.org/incubator


    I'll have a look on pgRouting.

    Regards,
    Julien.


    2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vi...@georepublic.de
    <mailto:vi...@georepublic.de>>:

        Hello Julien,

        Now about the documentation
        I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences:
        is that correct?
        
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master
        
<https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master>

        I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in the
        list of incubating projects), so this might not apply.

        .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png
           :scale: 100 %
           :alt: OSGeo Project
           :align: right
           :target:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html
        <http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html>

        ​
        ​But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍​
        ​You might as well do the PR so that the other members of the
        team can give you feed back.​
        ​Vicky.​
        ​​
        PS, in pgRouting   the documentation is done in such a way, to
        make minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo Live.
        On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet
        <moquet.jul...@gmail.com <mailto:moquet.jul...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Hi Vicky,
            My fork is up to date regarding the overview and
            quickstart: https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc
            <https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc>
            Before making a pull request, I need to test it over the
            OsGeoLive-10.5 (on wednesday or thursday).
            Although, as I read the sources.list include in this
            version, I don't really think the latest proj4 will be used.
            The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the
            stable 4.8.0-3 proj4 release to be used. See :
            
http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/
            
<http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/>

            and
            
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list
            
<https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list>

            That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4
            release on its overview.
            I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.
            Regards,
            Julien.
            2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara
            <vi...@georepublic.de <mailto:vi...@georepublic.de>>:

                Hi Julien, et all
                Maybe you can help me.
                It so happened that I sent another mail asking about
                what version to use, while reviewing today, I saw that
                I didn't send the mail to proj4.
                (my mail merge skills are not so good)
                So, here is the hand made mail:
                Hi all, With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we
                will be re-inserting each project into the OSGeo-Live
                baseline once someone from each project has replied to
                confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the
                application works as expected. Can you please:  0.
                Reply by return email to confirm that you have
                recieved this email and that you are able to check
                docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be better
                if you can)  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview
                is still accurate, or has been updated, (and version
                numbers are correct)  2. Reply to confirm you have run
                a recent OSGeo-Live version (the previous 10.5 version
                is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed.  We
                understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be
                installed on OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was
                installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
                (all in one reply is ok)
                Full package status can be seen here:
                
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
                
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150>
                Key Milestones ------------------- 18-Jun-2017    All
                docs reviewed and verified 21-Jun-2017    OSGeo-Live
                delivered to UAT (final application versions installed
                - Beta stage) 24-Jul-2017    OSGeo-Live Final ISO
                14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston ... full schedule
                
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
                
<http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB>

                On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter
                <cameron.shor...@gmail.com
                <mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                    Hi Julien,

                    Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm
                    looping in Niko and Vicky who are currently
                    wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If
                    you are familiar with it, you might be able to
                    help them.

                    Warm regards, Cameron

                    On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
                    Hi,
                    >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been
                    translated into other languages, including
                    proj4js, ..." > Agreed that metacrs is probably a
                    bit too ..
                    I am fully agree too.
                    And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can
                    help on the proj4 French Translation pages.
                    Regards,
                    2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault
                    <even.roua...@spatialys.com
                    <mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>>:

                        On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron
                        Shorter wrote:

                        > Hi Evan,

                        >

                        > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the
                        Proj4 projects together.

                        > However, it appears that proj4 is the only
                        project in that grouping

                        > which is active?

                        >

                        > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should
                        be dropped from OSGeo-Live

                        > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It
                        would be ok to say "Proj4

                        > has been translated into other languages,
                        including proj4js, ..."

                        >

                        > Your thoughts are welcome.

                        Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :

                        - proj4js: no opinion

                        - cs-map: no-opinion

                        - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath
                        by GDAL in particular, mostly in maintaince
                        mode, but can be treated as a technical
                        dependency that doesn't require to be visible
                        from users.

                        - proj4j: no opinion

                        - spatialreference.org
                        <http://spatialreference.org>: not maintained
                        in years. http://epsg.io/ would be a possible
                        replacement

                        Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ...
                        meta for folks exploring OSGeo-Live content,
                        so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a
                        standalone project.

--
                        Spatialys - Geospatial professional services

                        http://www.spatialys.com

-- Cameron Shorter
                    M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>

--
                Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
                Salzmannstraße 44,
                81739 München, Germany

                Vicky Vergara
                Operations Research

                eMail: vi...@georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
                Web:https://georepublic.info

                Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
                Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

                Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
                CEO: Daniel Kastl

--
        Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
        Salzmannstraße 44,
        81739 München, Germany

        Vicky Vergara
        Operations Research

        eMail: vi...@georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
        Web:https://georepublic.info

        Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
        Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

        Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
        CEO: Daniel Kastl

_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Reply via email to