Hi Gabriele, I understand the reasons for not being able to tag a release right away, no worries. I think we should focus on having an installer script for the Java version first (along with the documentation) and then we can see if there is time to include the Javascript version (or perhaps include it as beta for this release)
Best, Angelos On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Gabriele Prestifilippo < gabrieleprestifili...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > I’ve been talking with Patrick, and we agreed on versioning with a tagged > release WebWorldWind, although this cannot be achieved for technical > reasons before few weeks at least. I clearly understand that having a > tagged release is useful for different reasons. > > > > Since at the moment we cannot officially define it, I would suggest to > mark it as ‘pre-release’ or even 0.1.0 but not formally until they can mark > it. I still support the inclusion because, as I previously mentioned the > web version is the one with the greatest expectation and a wider future. > > > > Let me know what you think about it, or if you have other ideas regarding > it. Unless we could wait for the next release to include it. > > > > Best, > > Gabriele. > > > > > > > -- Angelos Tzotsos, PhD OSGeo Charter Member http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
