"Linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode...@lists.ozlabs.org> wrote on 2014/05/06 08:28:42: >
..... > > > That said, > > I don't object to having a way to label a PHY as attached via TBI if > > that's useful. I'm giving a mild, non-nacking (given the history) > > objection to using device_type for that (given other history). > > Personally, I think that TBI PHY support is a bit messy but I don't have > bandwidth to deal with that. The TBI PHY should be handled as a regular > PHY and right now is a special case Yes please! We will use the TBI as the only PHY in 1000BASE-X mode so naturally we want to see the TBI as its own PHY and monitor its link status, AN etc. Jocke _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
