On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 22:23 -0500, Emil Medve wrote: > Hello Scott, > > > At this point, I'm getting a bit lost in this thread and I feel we're > getting into more generic comments. I'll continue to answer to some of > your comments to make sure I understand them. However, one major comment > I feel you made was about seeing a full FMan binding. If that's a deal > breaker, please let me know and we'll just drop the patches
It's not an absolute deal breaker -- I did suggest the possibility of providing the mdio node as an ordinary ccsr node, not underneath an fman container. I'm just frustrated that getting a proper fman node is such a big deal. That should have been the first step of the upstreaming process -- not something that waits until everything is finished. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
