On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 06:25:09PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:44 +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> So this patch(the 2nd one) doesn't contribute to clear the warning and >> error. >> Only the first patch did it. Please ignore this one. > >But is it correct ? It's not right to keep a refcount elevated if we >don't have to.
The code refcount is introduced in commit 184cd4a3(powerpc/powernv: PCI support for p7IOC under OPAL v2). To me, it looks not necessary. > >Gavin, can you get to the bottom of that refcount business ? > >Cheers, >Ben. > -- Richard Yang Help you, Help me _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
