On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:44 +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > So this patch(the 2nd one) doesn't contribute to clear the warning and > error. > Only the first patch did it. Please ignore this one.
But is it correct ? It's not right to keep a refcount elevated if we don't have to. Gavin, can you get to the bottom of that refcount business ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
