> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:14 AM
> To: Kumar Gala
> Cc: Zang Roy-R61911; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1023: set IRQ[4:6, 11] to high level
> sensitive for PCIe
> 
> On 11/15/2011 03:51 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Roy Zang wrote:
> >
> > Should be setting ALL PCIe interrupts to '2'?  As I think in general
> > we say these PCIe are 'active high'.  The only reason I would think
> > we would NOT do this is if they are shared with some external device
> > that is 'active low'.  If so we should comment that somewhere (maybe
> > in the .dts, maybe just in the commit message).
> 
> I'd assume the ones that are pinned out are pulled high on the board.
yes. The boards pulled up the shared IRQs. PCIe specification does not specify 
'active low' or 'active high', but for PCI, the INTx is 'active low'.

> Active-low is normal, it's these non-pinned-out "external" interrupts
> that are pulled low inside the SoC that are weird.
I agree here. Do you want me to add something to point out the "weird" in the 
commit message?
Thanks.
Roy


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to