On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:31:01AM -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote: > Yes, but I think that is correct for it to be "1". The data > sheets for these parts that I checked had bit 1 marked as > reserved. Only OMR1MSKL and OMR3MSKL had extra definitions > such as the _IO and _UOT. The parts I checked which were > the sheets for the EX and SX (which cover another 6 or 7 > parts) all had it with just a single bit defined on that > register.
Ahh okay. I kind of think that this may need to be a seperate change. At the very least it needs to be explicitly mentioned in the change log. Yours Tony _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
