Dear Grant Likely, In message <fa686aa41001022118w6b41765ld145c646bfca9...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > As I said in a previous email; I understand the need for certain > scenarios, but in the general case it is not the mode that I think > should be encouraged. I don't want to merge additional targets for > .dtb embedded in the kernel image unless absolutely necessary, and I > want developers to have the mindset that .dtbs should be separate from > the kernel; and should be quasi-stable (or at least more stable than > the kernel itself) because I think that multiplatform is important, > and is going to become more important in the future. > > So I don't want to support it by default; but OTOH, I'm not going to > actively prevent embedded .dtb blobs either.
But by blocking the addition of such a make target you do actively prevent this, don;t you? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de The years of peak mental activity are undoubtedly between the ages of four and eighteen. At four we know all the questions, at eighteen all the answers. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
