Dear Grant Likely,
In message <fa686aa41001022113o46bad9d2xf6c026f5fa3e8...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Let's make this "uImage.old" (or "uImage.legacy" similar) and
> > "uImage", then.
>
> I'm not interested in renaming the target name for the current uImage
> format. I think it will cause too much breakage and pain to do so.
We did this before, and the argument then was "progress". Keep in mind
that the old arch/ppc uImage file is much more compatible to the
current arch/powerpc "cuImage" target than to the current "uImage".
I think the same should be done here.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
- Rich Kulawiec
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
