Dear Grant Likely, In message <fa686aa40912301502x48785614ya4dd5c71815a7...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > IIRC, uImage.fit.initrd.% should appear before uImage.fit.% in the > Makefile so that make behaves more consistently. Speaking of which, > the number of '.' in the name is getting rather large. Would you > consider using 'fitImage' instead of 'uImage.fit'?
Why chose a different name at all? We could still call it "uImage", meaning "U-Boot image" - U-Boot is clever enought o detect automatically if we pass it an old style or a fit image. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de If the odds are a million to one against something occuring, chances are 50-50 it will. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
