On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:19 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > so the node really is > describing the internal bus, not the entire SoC. On some chips it is > documented as the "internally memory mapped registers", or IMMR. So, > it is better to name this node in a way that reflects what it is (an > internal bus) instead of as the whole chip.
It's not even the internal bus. Flipper and Hollywood are separate chips from the PPC afaik. They are integrated northbridge + gfx + IOs basically. > Similarly, it is better to use a compatible value of something like: > compatible = "nintendo,flipper-immr"; (instead of "nintendo,flipper") > because your describing just the internal bus, not the entire chip. I would just call the nodes "flipper" and "hollywood". Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
