Hi Ben, > > BTW. If you guys are ever going to do another change to MAL, please > please plase, add the -one- major missing feature that's causing all the > pain and complication in the current design: Add a per-channel interrupt > masking option. > > The lack of ability to mask the interrupt per MAL channel is what forces > us to create that fake netdev structure in order to share the napi > device instance between all the EMACs in the system. This is very > inefficient too. We would be able to make things run a lot smoother if > we could just have a napi instance per EMAC, but for that, we need > per-channel interrupt masking. >
I will add a patch for the above as soon as I am done incorporating your comments on the MAL coalescing support. Thanks Prodyut _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
