Hi! > > Also, approaches such as [1] can make use of this > > extended infrastructure instead of putting the CPU to an arbitrary C-state > > when it is offlined, thereby providing the system administrator a rope to > > hang > > himself with should he feel the need to do so. > I didn't see the reason why administrator needs to know which state offline > cpu > should stay. Don't know about powerpc side, but in x86 side, it appears > deepest > C-state is already preferred. >
Agreed, deepest c-state is always best, there's no need to make it configurable. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
