On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:03 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote: > This was the > main objection to Venki's deepest sleep state for offline cpus patch.
Well, my main objection was that is was a single raw function pointer without any management layer around it. We have the exact same mess with the idle routine - and that has bitten us in the past. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
