On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:03 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote: > > This was the > > main objection to Venki's deepest sleep state for offline cpus patch. > > Well, my main objection was that is was a single raw function pointer > without any management layer around it. > > We have the exact same mess with the idle routine - and that has bitten > us in the past.
That said, I still think it makes sense to share this with the idle routine, we can make some callbacks unsuitable for hot-unplug just fine. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
