Hi all,

This report came from LKML, although I should post it here first,
the report said that there is a regression in linux-2.6.29 as to flushing a TLB 
entry that was going to be re-used when a context overflowed from the TLB.

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Have you verified that this change fixes your problem ?

I tested using "hackbench 100" and it was done successfully on my platform with 
e500(MPC8548).

>
> Can you re-submit to linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org mailing list, along with
> proper changeset comment and signed-off-by: line ?

I am sorry I don't know as to the proper changeset comment.

Signed-off-by: Hideo Saito <hsaito....@gmail.com>
---
--- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c.orig   2009-03-24 08:12:14.000000000 
+0900
+++ arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c        2009-05-20 18:33:53.000000000 
+0900
@@ -122,22 +122,22 @@ static unsigned int steal_context_up(uns
        struct mm_struct *mm;
        int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
        /* Pick up the victim mm */
        mm = context_mm[id];
 
        pr_debug("[%d] steal context %d from mm @%p\n", cpu, id, mm);
 
-       /* Mark this mm has having no context anymore */
-       mm->context.id = MMU_NO_CONTEXT;
-
        /* Flush the TLB for that context */
        local_flush_tlb_mm(mm);
 
+       /* Mark this mm has having no context anymore */
+       mm->context.id = MMU_NO_CONTEXT;
+
        /* XXX This clear should ultimately be part of local_flush_tlb_mm */
        __clear_bit(id, stale_map[cpu]);
 
        return id;
 }
 
 #ifdef DEBUG_MAP_CONSISTENCY
 static void context_check_map(void)
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to