Dear Scott, in message <4a01f602.2010...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > All of the above is duplicative (with even the same names) of stuff in > asm/cpm.h. Beyond just the duplication, what happens if both CPM2 and
OK, I can try to reuse the definitions from that file. > 512x are enabled in the same kernel? Hm... both architectures look sufficiently different to me that I don't see sense in trying such a thing. Do you think that needs to be supported? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "You ain't experienced..." "Well, nor are you." "That's true. But the point is ... the point is ... the point is we've been not experienced for a lot longer than you. We've got a lot of experience of not having any experience." - Terry Pratchett, _Witches Abroad_ _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
