Wolfgang Denk wrote:
+/*
+ * Define the buffer descriptor structure.
+ */
+typedef struct bufdesc {
+ ushort cbd_sc; /* Control and status info */
+ ushort cbd_datlen; /* Data length */
+ uint cbd_bufaddr; /* Buffer address */
+} cbd_t;
+
+/*
+ * The following definitions courtesy of commproc.h, which where
+ * Copyright (c) 1997 Dan Malek (dma...@jlc.net).
+ */
+#define BD_SC_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000)
+
+/*
+ * Buffer descriptor control/status used by Ethernet receive.
+ */
+#define BD_ENET_RX_EMPTY ((ushort)0x8000)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_INTR ((ushort)0x1000)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_LAST ((ushort)0x0800)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_FIRST ((ushort)0x0400)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_MISS ((ushort)0x0100)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_LG ((ushort)0x0020)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_NO ((ushort)0x0010)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_SH ((ushort)0x0008)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_CR ((ushort)0x0004)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_OV ((ushort)0x0002)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_CL ((ushort)0x0001)
+#define BD_ENET_RX_STATS ((ushort)0x013f) /* All status bits */
+
+/*
+ * Buffer descriptor control/status used by Ethernet transmit.
+ */
+#define BD_ENET_TX_READY ((ushort)0x8000)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_PAD ((ushort)0x4000)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_INTR ((ushort)0x1000)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_LAST ((ushort)0x0800)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_TC ((ushort)0x0400)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_DEF ((ushort)0x0200)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_HB ((ushort)0x0100)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_LC ((ushort)0x0080)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_RL ((ushort)0x0040)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_UN ((ushort)0x0002)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_CSL ((ushort)0x0001)
+#define BD_ENET_TX_STATS ((ushort)0x03ff) /* All status bits */
All of the above is duplicative (with even the same names) of stuff in
asm/cpm.h. Beyond just the duplication, what happens if both CPM2 and
512x are enabled in the same kernel?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
